Comparative Machine Learning Classification for QRIS Quishing Detection Based on URL Features

English

Authors

  • Permadi Kusuma Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo
  • Muhammad Yusuf Halim Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Timur
  • Ruhamah Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v8i3.8940

Keywords:

decision tree, machine learning, qr code, qris, url phishing

Abstract

The increasing adoption of the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) as a digital payment method has been accompanied by the emergence of quishing, a phishing attack that exploits malicious QR codes to redirect users to fraudulent websites. This study aims to compare the performance of three machine learning classification algorithms Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes—for detecting phishing URLs in a simulated QRIS quishing environment using URL-based features. The experiments were conducted using a publicly available phishing URL dataset representing simulated URLs that may be encountered after scanning malicious QR codes. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The experimental results show that Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy of 96.94%, outperforming Decision Tree 95.32% and Naïve Bayes 65.49%. The superior performance of Random Forest is attributed to its ensemble learning mechanism, which combines multiple decision trees to reduce overfitting, improve robustness, and provide more stable classification performance across diverse URL characteristics. This study contributes a comparative benchmark of machine learning algorithms for URL-based quishing detection and demonstrates that Random Forest is the most effective approach for supporting early phishing detection in QRIS payment systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajeng Muninggar, R., & Rahardiansah, T. (n.d.). Pemberdayaan Hukum Pembayaran Digital melalui Penggunaan Teknologi Quick Response Code Indonesian Standar di Masyarakat (Vol. 6).

Ajhari, A. A. (2024). Analisis Keamanan Sistem Pembayaran Digital Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS).

Alexander, A. D., Warta, J., Lubis, H., Mahbub, A. R., & Rasim, R. (2025). Analisis Komparatif Algoritma Machine Learning Untuk Mendeteksi Malicious Url Berbasis FITUR GANDA. Jurnal Manajamen Informatika Jayakarta, 5(3), 302. https://doi.org/10.52362/jmijayakarta.v5i3.2101

APWG. (2025). Phishing Activity Trends Report APWG. Anti-Phishing Working Group. https://docs.apwg.org/reports/apwg_trends_report_q1_2025.pdf

Fauzan, R., Vitianingsih, A. V., Cahyono, D., Maukar, A. L., & Suprio, Y. A. B. (2025). Penerapan Algoritma Klasifikasi pada Machine Learning untuk Deteksi Phishing. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 5(2), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v5i2.1968

Kresna Kencana, A., Dwi Ananda, F., & Dwi Hartanto, A. (2022). Implementasi Metode Random Forest Klasifikasi untuk Phishing Link Detection. Information Technology Journal, 4(2).

Mahendra Alvanof, M., & Kesuma Dinata, R. (2024). Penerapan Algoritma Random Forest dalam Deteksi dan Klasifikasi Ransomware. In Jurnal Elektronika dan Teknologi Informasi (Vol. 5, Number 2).

Mahmud, A. F., & Wirawan, S. (2024). Deteksi Phishing Website menggunakan Machine Learning Metode Klasifikasi (Vol. 13, Number 4). http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id

Marulino Angga. (2025). Pemalsuan Qris Pelaku Usaha Dalam Transaksi Sistem Pembayaran Digital Melalui Pola Kejahatan Phishing. 1–66.

Natalia Kristanty, D. (2024). Tren dan Tantangan Keamanan Bertransaksi dengan Qris dalam Era Transformasi Sistem Pembayaran Digital. In Syntax Admiration (Vol. 5, Number 10).

Njuguna, D., & Ndia, J. (2025). Quick Response Code Security Attacks and Countermeasures: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cyber Security, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.32604/jcs.2025.059398

Saputra, I. P. G. D., Kesiman, M. W. A., & Sunarya, I. M. G. (2026). Deteksi Pemalsuan QRIS MPM Statis Menggunakan YOLO, PaddleOCR dan Metode Berbasis Aturan. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 6(2), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i2.1020

Yudiana, A. A. (2023). Pengaruh Penggunaan Qris, Pendapatan, Tabungan Dan Gaya Hidup Terhadap Perilaku Konsumtif. Contemporary Studies in Economic, Finance and Banking, 2(4), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.21776/csefb.2023.02.4.15

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Kusuma, P., Muhammad Yusuf Halim, & Ruhamah. (2026). Comparative Machine Learning Classification for QRIS Quishing Detection Based on URL Features: English. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing, 8(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v8i3.8940