Refining Semantic Segmentation of Flood Images Using Edge Sharpening and CNN

Authors

  • Naili Suri Intizhami Institut Teknologi Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Indonesia
  • Eka Qadri Nuranti Institut Teknologi Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Anugrah Institut Teknologi Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Indonesia
  • Sri Sukma Tahir Institut Teknologi Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v6i2.8536

Keywords:

Flood Image Segmentation, Semantic Segmentation, Unsharp Masking, Edge Sharpening, Efficient Neural Network

Abstract

Post-disaster impact analysis is an important component in supporting mitigation planning, emergency response, and evidence-based decision-making after flood events. Visual data, such as flood images, can be used to identify affected areas and analyze environmental conditions through semantic segmentation. Semantic segmentation is a pixel-level classification process that assigns each pixel in an image to a specific object class. However, flood images collected from real-world conditions often have low visual quality, unclear object boundaries, and complex backgrounds, which may reduce the quality of segmentation results. This study proposes an edge-sharpening-based preprocessing approach combined with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to improve semantic segmentation performance on flood images. The proposed method applies unsharp masking to enhance edge and contour information before the images are processed by the CNN model. The experiments were conducted using flood and non-flood image datasets and compared with the ENet baseline and a modified ENet model. The evaluation was performed using visual comparison and quantitative metrics, including precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU). The results show that the proposed method achieved the best performance on the flood image dataset, with 98% precision, 98% recall, 98% F1-score, 97% accuracy, and 54% mIoU. These results outperform the comparative CNN models and indicate that edge sharpening can improve object boundary representation, particularly for flood images with blurred or low-quality visual characteristics.

References

A. Hammood, W., Abdullah Arshah, R., Mohamad Asmara, S., Al Halbusi, H., A. Hammood, O., & Al Abri, S. (2021). A Systematic Review on Flood Early Warning and Response System (FEWRS): A Deep Review and Analysis. Sustainability, 13(1), 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010440

Bagheri, A., & Liu, G.-J. (2025). Climate change and urban flooding: Assessing remote sensing data and flood modeling techniques: a comprehensive review. Environmental Reviews, 33, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2024-0065

Balaji, V., Song, T.-A., Malekzadeh, M., Heidari, P., & Dutta, J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for PET and SPECT Image Enhancement. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 65(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.265000

Bukhari, S. A. S., Shafi, I., Ahmad, J., Butt, H. T., Khurshaid, T., & Ashraf, I. (2025). Enhancing flood monitoring and prevention using machine learning and IoT integration. Natural Hazards, 121(4), 4837–4864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06986-3

Cheng, J., Deng, C., Su, Y., An, Z., & Wang, Q. (2024). Methods and datasets on semantic segmentation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle remote sensing images: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 211, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.03.012

Do?an, G., & Ergen, B. (2024). A new CNN-based semantic object segmentation for autonomous vehicles in urban traffic scenes. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 13(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-023-00313-5

Emek Soylu, B., Guzel, M. S., Bostanci, G. E., Ekinci, F., Asuroglu, T., & Acici, K. (2023). Deep-Learning-Based Approaches for Semantic Segmentation of Natural Scene Images: A Review. Electronics, 12(12), 2730. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12122730

Farhadi, H., Ebadi, H., Kiani, A., & Asgary, A. (2024). Near Real-Time Flood Monitoring Using Multi-Sensor Optical Imagery and Machine Learning by GEE: An Automatic Feature-Based Multi-Class Classification Approach. Remote Sensing, 16(23), 4454. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234454

Inthizami, N. S., Ma’sum, M. A., Alhamidi, M. R., Gamal, A., Ardhianto, R., Kurnianingsih, & Jatmiko, W. (2022). Flood video segmentation on remotely sensed UAV using improved Efficient Neural Network. ICT Express, 8(3), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2022.01.016

Intizhami, N. S., Nuranti, E. Q., & Bahar, N. I. (2023). Dataset for flood area recognition with semantic segmentation. Data in Brief, 51, 109768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109768

Intizhami, N. S., Nuranti, E. Q., & Bahar, N. I. (2025). Improving Semantic Segmentation of Flood Areas Using Rotation and Flipping-Based Feature Augmentation. Jurnal Teknik Informatika (Jutif), 6(3), 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.3.4564

Li, H. (2021). Image semantic segmentation method based on GAN network and ENet model. The Journal of Engineering, 2021(10), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12067

Lu, R.-H., Chen, T.-J., & Pan, J. (2024). Unsharp Mask Sharpening Detection via Global Analysis. 2024 35th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), 1–4. Belfast, United Kingdom: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSC61953.2024.10602852

Mandal, R., Sharma, B., & Chutia, D. (2025). Edge-Integrated IoT and Computer Vision Framework for Real-Time Urban Flood Monitoring and Prediction. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160946

Mishra, S., Vishwakarma, A., & Kumar, A. (2025). Multi-headed U-Net: An automated nuclei segmentation technique using Tikhonov filter-based unsharp masking. Smart Science, 13(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/23080477.2024.2373551

Muhadi, N. A., Abdullah, A. F., Bejo, S. K., Mahadi, M. R., & Mijic, A. (2021). Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation for Water Level Estimation Using Surveillance Camera. Applied Sciences, 11(20), 9691. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209691

Nair, B. B., Vallimeena, P., Gopalakrishnan, U., Rao, S. N., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2024). Enhanced Urban Flood Monitoring: Integrating Advanced Semantic Segmentation and Human Facial Feature and Posture Analysis. IEEE Access, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3513239

Safavi, F., & Rahnemoonfar, M. (2023). Comparative Study of Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Networks in Aerial Images During Flooding Events. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 16, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3219724

Suresh, T., Sundaralingam, H., Akilan, T., & Jahan, N. (2025). ECASeg: Enhancing Semantic Segmentation with Edge Context and Attention Strategy. Procedia Computer Science, 262, 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.202

Upadhyay, D., Malhotra, S., Gupta, M., & Mishra, S. (2024). Implementation of Pruned and Quantized Semantic Segmentation Neural Network Using Cambridge-Driving Labeled Video Database (CamVid) Dataset. 2024 2nd International Conference on Device Intelligence, Computing and Communication Technologies (DICCT), 1–6. Dehradun, India: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICCT61038.2024.10532844

Wang, Y. (2022). Remote sensing image semantic segmentation network based on ENet. The Journal of Engineering, 2022(12), 1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1049/tje2.12200

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Intizhami, N. S., Nuranti, E. Q., Anugrah, M., & Tahir, S. S. (2026). Refining Semantic Segmentation of Flood Images Using Edge Sharpening and CNN. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 6(2), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v6i2.8536

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.