Maximizing Learning Outcomes through Printed and Digital Learning Materials among Junior High School Students

Authors

  • Delona Ria Polhaupessy Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Rosina FJ Lekawael Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Inggrit Tanasale Pattimura University, Ambon, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8101

Keywords:

Adaptive Instructional Design, Blended Learning Cognitive Load, Digital Divide, Dual Literacies

Abstract

This study aims to analyze junior high school students' perceptions of the pedagogical superiority of printed and digital learning materials within a blended learning framework. The study used a quantitative descriptive survey design involving 30 students as respondents. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire that measured usage patterns, learning needs, and each medium's contribution to the learning process. The results showed that both types of media were perceived positively, but had different and complementary pedagogical functions. Print media was preferred to support concentration and intensive reading (Mean = 4.12), indicating its role in maintaining cognitive stability, strengthening conceptual understanding, and supporting in-depth reading.

In contrast, digital media received a higher average score (Mean = 4.25) for motivation and learning engagement, attributable to interactivity, multimodality, and immediate feedback features. However, the effectiveness of digital media was moderated by structural factors, with 30% of respondents reporting connectivity constraints and device limitations as significant barriers. Another important finding was that 90% of students recommended the hybrid approach, indicating metacognitive awareness of diverse learning needs. Thus, this study concludes that modernizing junior high school learning is not effective when achieved through full digitization, but rather through adaptive instructional design that integrates the tactile consistency and conceptual depth of print media with the flexibility and interactivity of digital media, in a contextually and equitably integrated manner.

References

Aldi, A., Mappincara, A., & Mus, S. (2025). Persepsi siswa tentang penggunaan media pembelajaran digital di SMP Negeri 1 Bantaeng. EDUSTUDENT: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.

Annisa, N. (2023). Students’ preferences toward printed and digital learning materials. Journal of Educational Studies, 12(2), 45–56.

Baker, T., & Driscoll, M. (2022). Perceived efficacy of traditional printed materials in secondary education: A survey of student outcomes. Journal of Instructional Design, 15(3), 112–125.

Baron, N. S. (2021). How we read now: Strategic choices for print, screen, and audio. Oxford University Press. (Added for critical depth on reading comprehension).

Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company. (Expert on the cognitive impact of digital media).

Cavanaugh, C., & DeWeese, A. (2023). Virtual schooling and blended learning. Routledge. (Expert on the practical implementation of hybrid secondary education)

Fenny, T., & Perdhani, W. C. (2024). Investigating Students’ Perceptions of Digital vs. Print Reading Materials. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 11(1), 142–153.

Ghafar, Z. N. (2024). Portability and durability: The enduring role of printed modules in 21st-century classrooms. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 12(1), 88–95.

Hrkotá?ová, D., & Ki?ková, M. (2024). Digital learning materials and student engagement in secondary education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 233–248.

Jie, W. (2026). Blended learning models for secondary education: Bridging traditional pedagogy and digital transformation. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Research, 4(2), 15–29.

Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Nadira, S., & Ningsih, S. K. (2025). Students’ Perception of Digital Learning Resources in Enhancing Their Vocabulary-Building Skills. JET (JOURNAL OF ENGLISH TEACHING) ADI BUANA), 10(02), 121-133.

Niepel, C., Hausen, J. E., Weber, A. M., & Möller, J. (2025). Understanding mean-level and intraindividual variability in state academic self-concept: The role of students' trait expectancies and values. Journal of Educational Psychology, 117(5), 772–788.

Nurlita, R., & Taufiq, W. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Digital Literacy-Based Media in English Language Learning. Jurnal Metaedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(1), 8-19.

OECD. (2021). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing.

Renaldi, R. (2025). Teacher and Student Perceptions Towards the Use of Technology-Based Learning Media in High School. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 6(3), 919-926.

Saputra, A., Rahayu, S., & Putri, L. (2024). The impact of digital resources on literary literacy: A comparative study of traditional and tech-enhanced settings. Journal of Language and Curriculum, 19(2), 201–215.

Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Academic. (Expert on the "digital divide" and social equity in classrooms).

Sultan, D. F. P., Dollah, S., & La Sunra, L. (2025). Exploring Students’ Preferences Between Print and Digital English Learning Materials at MTsN Makassar. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(4), 1054–1060.

Suparmi, S., Sumarno, A., Karwanto, K., Khamidi, A., & Haroyati, N. (2024). Pengaruh Digitalisasi dan Gaya Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP Kabupaten Magetan. Journal of Education Research, 5(2), 2396–2402.

Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. Harper. (Leading expert on the importance of "bi-literacy" in modern students).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-03

How to Cite

Polhaupessy, D. R., Lekawael, R. F., & Tanasale, I. (2026). Maximizing Learning Outcomes through Printed and Digital Learning Materials among Junior High School Students. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(01), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8101

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.