Phonological Processes of Hindi Loanwords in Indonesian: A Comparative Study with Indian Languages

Authors

  • Pauzan Pauzan State Islamic University of Mataram, Indonesia
  • Muhamad Zulpiani Hamdi State Islamic University of Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8142

Keywords:

Phonological Processes, Hindi Language, Indonesian Language.

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to examine the phonological processes involved in the adaptation of Hindi loanwords into Indonesian. To achieve this goal, the researcher employed a qualitative descriptive approach, relying on documented data of Hindi loanwords as used in Indonesian. The data set consisted of lexical items presented in phonetic transcription, which facilitated systematic phonological analysis. The study's findings revealed two central aspects of the adaptation process. The first aspect concerns vowels, where three main phonological processes were identified: lowering, weakening, and shortening. Lowering, often referred to as vowel drop, involves the modification of vowel height within the vowel space.

In contrast, weakening refers to the reduction in the strength or prominence of a vowel sound. Shortening further indicates the reduction of vowel duration in specific contexts. The second aspect pertains to consonantal processes, which include several modifications such as epenthesis, de-affrication, de-aspiration, consonant deletion, alveolarization, and the velarization of nasal sounds. These processes demonstrate the structural adjustments required to integrate Hindi phonological forms into the phonetic system of Indonesian. In summary, the study concludes that phonological adaptation in Hindi loanwords encompasses two major domains: vowel processes and consonant processes, each contributing to the naturalization of borrowed lexical items.

References

Adnania Nugra, H., & Subiyanto, A. (2023). Phonological Processes of English Words Pronounced by Japanese Found in Hey Say Jump! Songs. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 13(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.31503/madah.v13i2.421

Akmal, S., Harley, L. B., Rahmikawati, R., & Maulida, T. A. (2023). Acehnese Loanwords and Contact with Other World’s Languages. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.7909

Aprillianti, L. (2019). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PHONOLOGICAL PROCESSES BETWEEN TAMIL AND HINDI LOANWORDS INTO INDONESIAN LANGUAGE (A STUDY OF TRANSFORMATIONAL GENERATIVE PHONOLOGY). Universitas Diponegoro.

Arsala, Y. Z., Hanafi, H., & Dako, R. T. (2022). English Phonological Process Applied in Instagram Feed Video. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 3(2), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.37905/jetl.v3i2.16822

Barke, S., Kunkel, R., Polikarpova, N., Meinhardt, E., Bakovic, E., & Bergen, L. (2019). Constraint-based Learning of Phonological Processes. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 6175–6185. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1639

Cabbage, K. L., & DeVeney, S. L. (2020). Treatment Approach Considerations for Children With Speech Sound Disorders in School-Based Settings. Topics in Language Disorders, 40(4), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000229

Cahyaningrum, A. (2023). English Pronunciation by Korean EFL Learners on Hilokal Language Educational Application. Elsya?: Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i1.9812

Creel, S. C. (2022). Preschoolers Have Difficulty Discriminating Novel Minimal-Pair Words. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(7), 2540–2553. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00029

Dalilan. (2023). Originally Single Word Borrowing from English in My Stupid Boss: An Analysis of their Syntactical Position in Indonesian Language. ELITE Journal, 5(1), 85–92.

Fajrina, E., & Irawan, A. M. (2024). The Analysis of English Loanwords Used by Indonesian Generation Z in Social Media “Threads.” English Language and Literature, 13(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i1.127734

Faridah, F., Harahap, H. F., Fithriani, R., & Mukminin, A. (2026). Politics, economics, and identity: Mapping a virtual linguistics landscape in Indonesia. Power and Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438261430823

Hasel, C. A. (2022). The Research Comparison Between the Consonants of Bahasa Indonesia and Chinese Mandarin. MANDARINABLE?: Journal of Chinese Studies, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.20961/mandarinable.v1i1.322

Hegde, M. N. (2021). A Critical Review of Phonological Theories. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 40(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/jose.JOSE_7_21

HICKEY, R. (2020). On the recent history of low vowels in English. English Language and Linguistics, 24(3), 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674320000192

Jaber, A., Omari, O., & Al-Jarrah, R. (2023). Emphasis spread: The domain and trigger. Heliyon, 9(7), e17476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17476

Kent, R. D., & Rountrey, C. (2020). What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(3), 1749–1778. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00178

LaFond, B. T. (2024). Latin vowel weakening in phonetic perspective. Indo-European Linguistics, 12(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-bja10032

Liu, J., Hilton, C. B., Bergelson, E., & Mehr, S. A. (2023). Language experience predicts music processing in a half-million speakers of fifty-four languages. Current Biology, 33(10), 1916-1925.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.067

Oktaviana, E., Ulfa, M., Kusuma Negara, S., Timur, J., & Jakarta, D. (2025). The Use of Integrated Digital Series Image Media with A Deep Learning Approach to Improve Narrative Writing Skills. IDEAS Journal on Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 8590–8600. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7963

Olson, D. J. (2024). A systematic review of proficiency assessment methods in bilingualism research. International Journal of Bilingualism, 28(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231153720

Oncho, T. N. (2025). Phonological Simplification Strategies in Oromo-Speaking Children: A Perspective from Optimality Theory. International Journal Online of Humanities, 24–42. https://doi.org/10.24113/ijohmn.v11i3.312

Pratidina, R. G. P., & Agus Subiyanto. (2024). The Characteristics of Korean Artists in Pronouncing English Words on Korean Reality Shows: A Generative Phonology Perspective. Rainbow?: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Culture Studies, 13(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v13i1.1270

Prihandani, R. A., & Subiyanto, A. (2021). Phonological Processes of English Loanwords From French: A Transformational Generative Phonology Approach. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, Dan Informasi, 5(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.5.1.25-42

Rosa, R. N., Refnaldi, R., & Jufrizal, J. (2022). Phonological Processes and Rules of Bahasa Minangkabau: A Generative Phonology Approach. The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7882/CGP/v20i01/125-136

S, I. S., Risagarniwa, Y. Y., & Sunarni, N. (2021). Gairaigo in The Covid-19 Pandemic Era: A Study of Transformational Generative Phonology. JAPANEDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Bahasa Jepang, 6(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.17509/japanedu.v6i2.32363

Sayogie, F., & Adbaka, M. F. (2022). Interlingual Errors in Indonesian EFL learners’ Pronunciation: From Minimal Pairs to Speaking Ability. Elsya?: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i2.9693

Teng, C., Heydarnejad, T., Hasan, Md. K., Omar, A., & Sarabani, L. (2022). Mobile assisted language learning in learning English through social networking tools: An account of Instagram feed-based tasks on learning grammar and attitude among English as a foreign language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012004

Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Hensley, K. (2023). Number and syllabification of following consonants influence use of long versus short vowels in English disyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 129, 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104399

Trisna, K., Uhn, D., Bagus, G., & Denpasar, S. (2021). Language Use: Code Mixing, Code Switching, Borrowing, Pidginization, and Creolization (Vol. 4, Number 1).

Ul Muyassaroh, L. (2021). COMPARISON OF LOAN WORD FROM CHINESE IN INDONESIAN. European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements (EJHEA), 2(6), 1–5. https://www.scholarzest.com

Yani Lubis, Fatimah Azzahra Siregar, & Cut Ria Manisha. (2023). The Basic Of English Phonology: A Literature Review. Jurnal Insan Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.59581/jipsoshum-widyakarya.v1i3.805

YASEEN, A. (2023). Thinking outside the guttural box: fresh perspectives on vowel lowering in Qeltu. Espaces Linguistiques, (5). https://doi.org/10.25965/espaces-linguistiques.669

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Pauzan, P., & Hamdi, M. Z. (2026). Phonological Processes of Hindi Loanwords in Indonesian: A Comparative Study with Indian Languages. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(01), 904–922. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8142

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.