Managing Contextual Indonesian Language Learning: A Comparative Study of Urban and Rural Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Siti Nurfitriyana Universitas Islam Nusantara Bandung
  • Yosal Iriantara Universitas Islam Nusantara Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8249

Keywords:

Contextual Teaching and Learning, learning strategies, Indonesian language, learning outcomes, elementary school

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Indonesian language learning strategies based on the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model in improving elementary school students’ learning outcomes. The research employed a qualitative approach using a multisite case study design, conducted at SDN Cibeureum Hilir CBM in Sukabumi City and SDN Sungapan in Sukabumi Regency. Data were collected through observations, in-depth interviews, documentation, and learning outcome tests involving teachers, students, and school principals. Data analysis was carried out using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that CTL-based learning strategies are implemented through four main stages: planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling. In the planning stage, teachers design contextual learning activities aligned with students’ real-life experiences, although with varying levels of structure. In the organizing stage, classroom management and collaboration support student-centered learning, despite differences in resource availability. In the implementation stage, CTL creates an active and meaningful learning environment that enhances students’ engagement and language skills. In the controlling stage, evaluation and follow-up actions are carried out through tests, assignments, and observations, although the consistency of these practices varies across schools. The study concludes that CTL-based learning strategies positively improve students’ motivation, participation, and learning outcomes in Indonesian language subjects. However, the effectiveness of CTL is influenced by teacher competence, the availability of learning resources, and the school context. Therefore, strengthening teacher capacity and improving learning facilities are essential to optimize the implementation of contextual learning in elementary education.

References

Adrias, & Ruswandi, A. (2025). Desain Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mix Method. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Anas, I., Astuty, A. D., & Amri, A. (2026). Innovative Pedagogies for Student-Centered Language Learning: Teachers’ Narratives from Southeast Asia. Available at SSRN 6037394.

Bulusan, F., CABACANG, K. M. A. Y. A., Duero, M. G. C., Malate, R. A. L., Mangao, J. F., & Parcon, D. P. (2025). Emerging strategies in imbibing learner-centered education in the 21st century language classrooms: a decade scoping review in southeast asia. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 8(6), 46–57.

Cresswell, J. W. (2019). Research design?: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran edisi keempat (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19–26.

Haerazi, H., Prayati, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). PRACTICING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING (CTL) APPROACH TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’READING COMPREHENSION IN RELATION TO MOTIVATION. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139–146.

Joshi, A. S. (2026). Transforming Learning Experiences: A Case Study of Integrating Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in the Physics Course within a Bachelor of Technology Program. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 86–97.

Kaharu, S. N., Aqil, M., Hariana, K., & Boromang, S. Y. (2023). The influence of the contextual teaching and learning (CTL) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 11(3), 937–944.

Lemes, M. A., Marin, M. J. S., Lazarini, C. A., Bocchi, S. C. M., & Higa, E. de F. R. (2021). Evaluation strategies in active learning in higher education in health: integrative review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 74(2), e20201055.

Lincoln, Y., & Guba, B. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Pulications. Inc.

Linggasari, E., & Rochaendi, E. (2022). Indonesian language learning in elementary schools through life skills education model. Literasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(1), 40–62.

Luo, Z., Abbasi, B. N., Yang, C., Li, J., & Sohail, A. (2024). A systematic review of evaluation and program planning strategies for technology integration in education: Insights for evidence-based practice. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21133–21167.

Mallika, A. I. (2024). The influence of the contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model on improving critical thinking skills in mathematics among junior high school students. Journal of Education Innovation and Curriculum Development, 2(2), 41–48.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third edit). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.

Muhsyanur, M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning on Critical Thinking Skills in Indonesian Language Education. TRICKS: Journal of Education and Learning Practices, 1(3), 12–23.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

Sari, A. R., Gummah, S., Syukroyanti, B. A., & Habibi, H. (2024). The effect of contextual teaching and learning model assisted by video on students’ learning outcomes and motivation. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 12(2), 197–211.

Syaifuddin, T., & Nurlaela, L. (2021). Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model to students improve learning outcome at senior high school of model terpadu Bojonegoro. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(5), 528–535.

Tari, D. K., & Rosana, D. (2019). Contextual teaching and learning to develop critical thinking and practical skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 12102. IOP Publishing.

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Frèrejean, J. (2024). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Yusyac, R., Muslem, A., & Yasin, B. (2021). Using contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach to improve students’ speaking ability. English Education Journal, 12(3), 460–476.

Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments (pp. 35–50). Springer.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-03

How to Cite

Nurfitriyana, S., & Iriantara, Y. (2026). Managing Contextual Indonesian Language Learning: A Comparative Study of Urban and Rural Elementary Schools. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(01), 975–989. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8249

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.