Dilema Etika Guru dalam Menjaga Integritas Penilaian: Studi Fenomenologis

Teachers' Ethical Dilemmas in Maintaining Assessment Integrity: A Phenomenological Study

Authors

  • Fahmi Alizar Nur Fachrudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Aim AbdulKarim Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Rika Sartika Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i02.9107

Keywords:

dilema etika, fenomenologi, integritas penilaian, kode etik guru, komitmen moral profesi, penilaian pembelajaran, moral actor

Abstract

Assessment integrity is a fundamental principle in education, ensuring the objectivity, fairness, and credibility of learning outcomes. However, teachers often face ethical dilemmas when their professional moral commitments clash with institutional demands, school policies, and parental expectations. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of Pancasila Education teachers as they navigate ethical dilemmas, interpret value conflicts, and make decisions to uphold assessment integrity. The study employs Max van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with Pancasila Education teachers and school supervisors, then analyzed using Van Manen's stages of thematic reflection. The study reveals that assessment integrity is a dynamic moral decision-making process involving the negotiation of professionalism, institutional policies, and students' interests. Teachers engage in various forms of ethical deliberation through reflection, the use of assessment evidence, dialogue with stakeholders, and the interpretation of spirituality as a source of moral legitimacy when facing dilemmas. These findings expand the moral decision-making model by demonstrating that the moral process is cyclical and influenced by social context, school culture, and professional experience. Assessment integrity is understood not merely as procedural compliance, but as a reflective practice continuously negotiated within the teacher's professional experience. The study contributes theoretically to the fields of phenomenology, moral decision-making, and teacher professional ethics, while underscoring the importance of strengthening ethical literacy in education policy and teacher professional development.

Author Biographies

Aim AbdulKarim, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Nama Lengkap            : Prof. Dr. H. Aim Abdulkarim, M.Pd

Unit/Prodi/Jurusan       : Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Afiliasi                            : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Negara                           : Indonesia

Email                             :  aimabdulkarim@upi.edu

No HP/WA                    : 085220210644

Alamat Pos                    : Bandung

Google Scholar ID       : https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Nj2FjJwAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao

Scopus ID                      : 57203758979

Peran dalam Naskah   : Methodology, Formal Analysis, Resources.

Rika Sartika, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Nama Lengkap            : Dr. Rika Sartika, M.Pd.

Unit/Prodi/Jurusan       : Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Afiliasi                            : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Negara                           : Indonesia

Email                             : rikasartika@upi.edu

No HP/WA                    : 081321225156

Alamat Pos                    : Bandung

Google Scholar ID       : https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=MJs9JCQAAAAJ&hl=en

Scopus ID                      : 57395575900

Peran dalam Naskah   : Data Curation, Project Administration.

References

Abdulkarim, A., Komalasari, K., Saripudin, D., Ratmaningsih, N., & Anggraini, D. N. (2020). Development of a unity in diversity-based pancasila education text book for Indonesian universities. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13125a

Afriadi, B., Komarudin, & Sutisna, A. (2024). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Civic Education Curriculum in Indonesia: A Case Study of the KTSP Curriculum, the 2013 Curriculum, and the Independent Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 13(5), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n5p331

Banks, S. (2021). Ethics and Values in Social Work Fifth Edition (5th ed.). Red Globe Press. www.basw.co.uk

Cronqvist, M. (2025). Teachers’ ethical responsibility in teaching; to guide the children about right and wrong. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(4), 857–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2360901

Foucault, M. (1978). Discipline and Punish The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books.

Gao, R., Liu, J., & Yin, B. (2021). An Expanded Ethical Decision-making Model to Resolve Ethical Dilemmas in Assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100978

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society?: outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley?: University of California Press.

Heidegger, Martin. (1962). Being and time. Blackwell.

Johnson, R. L., Liu, J., & Burgess, Y. (2017). A model for making decisions about ethical dilemmas in student assessment. Journal of Moral Education, 46(2), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1313725

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2024). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2024. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan. https://data.kemendikdasmen.go.id/publikasi/pendidikan/asesmen-nasional-and-rapor-pendidikan?year=2024

Kidder, R. M. . (1995). How good people make tough choices. Morrow.

Lickona, T. (1991). EDUCATING FOR CHARACTER: HOW OUR SCHOOLS CAN TEACH RESPECT AND RESPONSIBILITY. Bantam Books.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.

Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout how organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it ,. Jossey-Bass.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception (Routledge & Kegan Paul, Tran.). Taylor and Francis.

Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass. https://archive.org/details/transformativedi0O000mezi

Normann, D. A. (2025). Faithful or truthful? Dilemmas encountered by teachers when implementing reduced grading. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-025-09457-w

Pope, N., Green, S. K., Johnson, R. L., & Mitchell, M. (2009). Examining teacher ethical dilemmas in classroom assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 778–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.013

Rasooli, A., Rasegh, A., Zandi, H., & Firoozi, T. (2023). Teachers’ Conceptions of Fairness in Classroom Assessment: An Empirical Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(3), 260–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221130742

Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development advances in research and theory. Praeger.

Sartika, R., Praja, W. N., & Azis, A. (2022). Sustainable development goals: Recognition of Pancasila education materials in shaping student ethics in the digital era. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(2), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i2.48285

Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2020). A Multinational Study of Teachers’ Codes of Ethics: Attitudes of Educational Leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 104(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636520907694

Van Mannen, M. (2016). Researching Lived Experience Second Edition. Routledge.

Winataputra, U. (2012). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan. Untuk Mencerdaskan Kehidupan Bangsa: Gagasan, Instrumental, dan. Praksis. Widya Aksara Press.

Yanti, Y., Tinggi, H. S., Islam, A., & Arafah, D. (2025). Etika Profesi Dalam Praktik Keguruan (Vol. 1, Number 2). https://glonus.org/index.php/inklusi

Downloads

Published

2026-08-05

How to Cite

Fachrudin, F. A. N., AbdulKarim, A., & Sartika, R. (2026). Dilema Etika Guru dalam Menjaga Integritas Penilaian: Studi Fenomenologis: Teachers’ Ethical Dilemmas in Maintaining Assessment Integrity: A Phenomenological Study. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(02), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i02.9107