Pengaruh Penerimaan E-learning Besmart terhadap Self-Directed Learning Mahasiswa: Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model
The Influence of Besmart E-learning Acceptance on Students' Self-Directed Learning: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i02.9223Keywords:
E-Learning, Besmart, PLS-SEM, Self-Directed Learning Technology Acceptance ModelAbstract
Student acceptance of Learning Management Systems (LMS) is a crucial factor in supporting the effectiveness of online learning in higher education. Besmart is a Moodle-based LMS used at Yogyakarta State University (UNY), enabling students to access materials, complete assignments, and engage in discussions independently. However, research on LMS technology acceptance in Indonesia has largely focused on variables such as intention or system usage behaviour, often failing to address self-directed learning as a more substantive outcome—particularly in the context of Besmart UNY. This study employed a quantitative approach using an explanatory survey method. Data were collected via online questionnaires from 180 active Besmart students, selected through purposive sampling. The data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4 software. The results indicate that all construct indicators met the required validity and reliability criteria. Perceived ease of use (B = 0.387; t = 4.965; p < 0.05) and perceived usefulness (B = 0.472; t = 6.354; p < 0.05) both exerted a positive and significant influence on self-directed learning, with these two constructs explaining 67.6% of the variance (R² = 0.676). Acceptance of Besmart—specifically perceived usefulness—contributed significantly to student self-directed learning; consequently, future LMS development should prioritise enhancing substantive benefits that support users' independent learning processes.References
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Garad, A., Al-Ansi, A. M., & Qamari, I. N. (2021). The Role of E-learning Infrastructure and Cognitive Competence in Distance Learning Effectiveness During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-Directed Learning: Toward A Comperhensive Model. Adult Education Quartely, 18–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. In Sage. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hartanto, D. D., & Triyono, S. (2021). Manajemen Pembelajaran Bahasa Jawa Menggunakan Moda Besmart UNY. Piwulang?: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa, 9(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/piwulang.v9i2.47841
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning?: A Guide For Learners and Teachers. Association Press.
Munir. (2010). Penggunaan Learning Management System (LMS) di Perguruan Tinggi: Studi Kasus di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.222
Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294
Priyanto, P., Sofyan, H., & Surjono, H. D. (2017). The determinats of e-learning usage by teachers of vocational high schools in the Yogyakarta Special Region. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v7i1.12770
Rahmawati, R. N., & Narsa, I. M. (2019). Penggunaan e-learning dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232
Samed Al-Adwan, A., Nofal, M., Akram, H., Awni Albelbisi, N., & Al-Okaily, M. (2022). Towards a Sustainable Adoption of E-Learning Systems: The Role of Self-Directed Learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.28945/4980
Sasongko, A. T., Ekhsan, M., & Fatchan, M. (2025). Dataset on technology acceptance in E-learning: A PLS-SEM analysis using extended TAM among undergraduate students in Indonesia. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100192
Sugiyono, P. D. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Source: MIS Quarterly (Vol. 36, Number 1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mufida Husain, Anik Ghufron

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









