Pengaruh Penerimaan E-learning Besmart terhadap Self-Directed Learning Mahasiswa: Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model

The Influence of Besmart E-learning Acceptance on Students' Self-Directed Learning: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach

Authors

  • Mufida Husain Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Anik Ghufron Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i02.9223

Keywords:

E-Learning, Besmart, PLS-SEM, Self-Directed Learning Technology Acceptance Model

Abstract

Student acceptance of Learning Management Systems (LMS) is a crucial factor in supporting the effectiveness of online learning in higher education. Besmart is a Moodle-based LMS used at Yogyakarta State University (UNY), enabling students to access materials, complete assignments, and engage in discussions independently. However, research on LMS technology acceptance in Indonesia has largely focused on variables such as intention or system usage behaviour, often failing to address self-directed learning as a more substantive outcome—particularly in the context of Besmart UNY. This study employed a quantitative approach using an explanatory survey method. Data were collected via online questionnaires from 180 active Besmart students, selected through purposive sampling. The data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4 software. The results indicate that all construct indicators met the required validity and reliability criteria. Perceived ease of use (B = 0.387; t = 4.965; p < 0.05) and perceived usefulness (B = 0.472; t = 6.354; p < 0.05) both exerted a positive and significant influence on self-directed learning, with these two constructs explaining 67.6% of the variance (R² = 0.676). Acceptance of Besmart—specifically perceived usefulness—contributed significantly to student self-directed learning; consequently, future LMS development should prioritise enhancing substantive benefits that support users' independent learning processes.

References

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Garad, A., Al-Ansi, A. M., & Qamari, I. N. (2021). The Role of E-learning Infrastructure and Cognitive Competence in Distance Learning Effectiveness During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33474

Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-Directed Learning: Toward A Comperhensive Model. Adult Education Quartely, 18–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. In Sage. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hartanto, D. D., & Triyono, S. (2021). Manajemen Pembelajaran Bahasa Jawa Menggunakan Moda Besmart UNY. Piwulang?: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa, 9(2), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/piwulang.v9i2.47841

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-Directed Learning?: A Guide For Learners and Teachers. Association Press.

Munir. (2010). Penggunaan Learning Management System (LMS) di Perguruan Tinggi: Studi Kasus di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.222

Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294

Priyanto, P., Sofyan, H., & Surjono, H. D. (2017). The determinats of e-learning usage by teachers of vocational high schools in the Yogyakarta Special Region. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v7i1.12770

Rahmawati, R. N., & Narsa, I. M. (2019). Penggunaan e-learning dengan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i2.26232

Samed Al-Adwan, A., Nofal, M., Akram, H., Awni Albelbisi, N., & Al-Okaily, M. (2022). Towards a Sustainable Adoption of E-Learning Systems: The Role of Self-Directed Learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 21, 245–267. https://doi.org/10.28945/4980

Sasongko, A. T., Ekhsan, M., & Fatchan, M. (2025). Dataset on technology acceptance in E-learning: A PLS-SEM analysis using extended TAM among undergraduate students in Indonesia. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100192

Sugiyono, P. D. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Source: MIS Quarterly (Vol. 36, Number 1).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-07

How to Cite

Husain, M., & Ghufron, A. (2026). Pengaruh Penerimaan E-learning Besmart terhadap Self-Directed Learning Mahasiswa: Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Besmart E-learning Acceptance on Students’ Self-Directed Learning: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(02), 1966–1978. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i02.9223