Transformation of Electoral Regulations and Substantive Democracy in Post Reform Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47709/governors.v4i1.6495Keywords:
Electoral Regulation, Substantive Democracy, Political Thresholds, Open List Proportional System, Vote BuyingAbstract
Since the 1998 Reform, Indonesia has experienced major changes in its electoral system. However, these changes have not always strengthened democracy in practice. This study aims to examine how the political elite's power has influenced the design and implementation of electoral regulations between 1999 and 2024. Using a qualitative and descriptive-analytical approach, the study draws on institutional theory and the concept of substantive democracy. Data were collected from laws, Constitutional Court decisions, and institutional reports. The findings show that regulations such as electoral thresholds have concentrated power among political elites, limiting political competition and leadership renewal. The open-list system encourages expensive, personality-driven campaigns, weakening accountability and party unity. The use of the noken system in Papua, though culturally affirming, challenges democratic values of equality and individual participation. Widespread vote buying reflects the persistence of patron-client politics. Additionally, the deaths of many polling officers in 2019 highlight the state’s failure to protect election workers. The study concludes that Indonesia’s electoral rules remain procedural and lack substance. Electoral reform is urgently needed to ensure fairness, transparency, and safety in future elections.
References
Agustine, O. V. (2019). Implementasi Noken Sebagai Hukum Tidak Tertulis Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i1.302
Aisy, S. R., Hakim, H. A., Krisnan, J., Hardyanthi, T., & Masithoh, M. Q. D. (2021). Customary criminal law in the Eastern of Indonesia: the special autonomy Province of Papua. Borobudur Law Review, 3(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.31603/burrev.5553
Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s Democratic Paradox: Competitive Elections amidst Rising Illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412
Aspinall, E., Rohman, N., Hamdi, A. Z., Rubaidi, & Triantini, Z. E. (2017). Vote buying in Indonesia: Candidate strategies, market logic and effectiveness. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2016.31
Asrinaldi, & Yusoff, M. A. (2023). Power consolidation and its impact on the decline of democracy in Indonesia under President Jokowi. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2232579
Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758756
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Efriza, N. (2019). Eksistensi Partai Politik Dalam Persepsi Publik [The Existence of The Political Parties in Public Perception]. Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional, 10(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v10i1.1314
Eviany, E., & Sutiyo. (2023). Perlindungan masyarakat: Penyelenggaraan ketentraman, ketertiban umum, dan manajemen kebencanaan. PT Nas Media Indonesia.
Febriansyah, R., & Husnayanti, A. (2019). Analisis Beban Kerja Kelompok Penyelenggara Pemungutan Suara (KPPS) Menggunakan Metode FTE (Full Time Equivalent) pada Pemilihan Umum Serentak Tahun 2019 di Kabupaten Bangka Tengah. Electoral Governance Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemilu Indonesia, 1(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.46874/tkp.v1i1.15
Fernandes, A., Okhtariza, N., & Krisetya, B. A. (2024). Pemilih Muda, Persepsi Korupsi, dan Pemilu 2024.
Fu’adah, A. (2024). Implikasi Etika Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum terhadap Penegakan Demokrasi di Indonesia: Sebuah Evaluasi. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual, 229–239.
Hadad, A. Al, Kurniawan, A., & Nurdiansyah, I. (2022). The Effectiveness of the Presidential Threshold Concept in the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Election System in Indonesia. Khazanah Hukum, 4(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i2.18063
Halida, R., Susianto, H., Mujani, S., & Pratama, A. J. (2022). Vote-Selling as Unethical Behavior: Effects of Voter’s Inhibitory Self-Control, Decision Toward Vote-Buying Money, and Candidate’s Quality in Indonesia Election. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5643
Khaitan, T. (2021). Guarantor Institutions. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 16(S1), S40–S59. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.19
Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
Mietzner, M. (2019). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266
Nord, M., Altman, D., Angiolillo, F., Fernandes, T., God, A. G., & Lindberg, S. I. (2025). DEMOCRACY REPORT 2025 25 Years of Autocratization – Democracy Trumped?
Pamungkas, C. (2018). Noken Electoral System in Papua Deliberative Democracy in Papuan Tradition. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 19(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v19i2.389
Pandiangan, A. (2019). Kelompok Penyelenggara Pemungutan Suara (Kpps) Pemilu 2019: Tanggungjawab Dan Beban Kerja. The Journal of Society & Media, 3(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v3n1.p17-34
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208.
Pratama, A. A., Muna, K., Fernando, Z. J., & Anditya, A. W. (2025). Revitalisasi Konstitusional Berbasis Pancasila Dalam Penghapusan Presidential Threshold. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 5(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v5i1.725
Razak, A. (2023). Sistem Proporsionalitas Terbuka sebagai Identitas Demokrasi Indonesia: Eksistensi dan Implikasi. Rechtsregel?: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v6i1.35252
Rosmini, Paisal Abdi, & IhsanTajali Nur. (2024). Problematika Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Pada Pemilihan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 114/PUU-XX/2022). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.58540/jih.v1i1.585
Saad, M., Sabrina, D. F., & Sukardi. (2022). The Political Cartel of Presidential Candidacy through Threshold Brings Up a Single Candidate. Media Iuris, 5(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v5i1.32040
Saputra, M. R., Setiadi, W., Thohari, A. A., Hukum, F., Pembangunan, U., & Veteran, N. (2024). Analisis Potensi Implementasi Sistem Politik Tanpa Partai di Indonesia dan Dampaknya terhadap Demokrasi dan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan. 2(4).
Silvanti, A. (2024). Relevansi Penghapusan Parliamentary Threshold Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 116/PUU-XXI/2023. Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(1), 24–33.
Sudrajat, H., Hamid, A., Mahrida, Tampubolon, M., Yunus, N. R., Saragih, G. M., Mikhael, L., Ramadhani, R., Hasiah, & Asroni, A. (2022). Politik Hukum Pemilu. In Konstitusi Pers. PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI.
Sukadi, I., Jundiani, J., Bachri, S., Sinal, M., & As-Suvi, A. Q. (2024). Presidential Threshold in The Election of The President and Vice President from A Constitution and Human Rights Perspective. Mimbar Keadilan, 17(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v17i2.10320
Zuhri, S. (2018). Proses Politik dalam Pembentukan Regulasi Pemilu: Analisis Pertarungan Kekuasaan pada Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 3(2), 94–107.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Puadi Puadi, Bachtiar Bachtiar, Filipus Wahyu Wicaksono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
