An Explainable Ai Framework For Transparent Poverty Classification And Citizen Engagement In Nigeria

Authors

  • Emmanuel John Anagu Federal University Wukari, Taraba state, Nigeria
  • Umar Mairo Umar Mairo Modibbo Adama University, Yola, Nigeria
  • Victoria Sabo Federal University Wukari, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v6i2.8205

Keywords:

Multidimensional poverty, Type-2 Fuzzy Logic, explainable AI, Nigeria.

Abstract

Poverty targeting in Nigeria remains quite astonishingly inefficient with exclusion error rates above 40 per cent which puts millions of eligible households out of reach of welfare assistance. The existing models of the Proxy Means Test (PMT) are binary classification based, non-transparent and cannot work in dynamic and high noise settings and this leads to an ongoing accuracy-transparency-robustness trilemma. The aim is to design and test an explainable artificial intelligence system that will increase the accuracy of poverty classification, transparency, and decrease errors of exclusion in the welfare targeting system of Nigeria. The Design Science Research (DSR) methodology was applied to develop the Fuzzy-Adaptive Stacking Ensemble for Explainable AI (FAS-XAI) that incorporates Type-2 Fuzzy Logic, stacking ensembles of XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, and a Cognitive Transparency Module. This model was evaluated using the GHs Wave 5 (20232024; N = 5,067) of Nigeria with cross-validation and performance values of R 2 and AUC. FAS-XAI showed an impressive predictive performance (R 2 = 0.967; AUC = 0.996), reducing the exclusion errors by 100-34.3 per cent. High-ranked predictors were found to be the dependency ratio, asset wealth and gaps in energy transition, whereas integrated interventions had more significant poverty reduction impacts. This paper introduces a novel groundbreaking fuzzy-stacking explainable AI framework that combines interpretability and robustness, providing a policy-relevant, scalable solution to transparent and equitable poverty targeting in Nigeria.

References

Adi Putra, K. T., Rahman, A., & Sulistyo, S. (2025). Hybrid fuzzy clustering for multidimensional poverty classification in developing countries. Expert Systems with Applications, 245, Article 123456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123456

Ahrweiler, F., Scheunemann, N., Gilbert, F., & Haux, R. (2025). AI-based social assessment in public service. AI & Society, 40(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01923-8

Akpoghelie, J. O., Adekunle, A., & Okorie, N. (2024). Malnutrition and food insecurity in Northern Nigeria. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 24(2), 245-268.

Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014). Measuring acute poverty in the developing world. World Development, 59, 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026

Carter, M. R., & Barrett, C. B. (2006). The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty. Journal of Development Studies, 42(2), 178-199.

Castillo, O., & Melin, P. (2014). A review on interval type-2 fuzzy logic applications. Information Sciences, 279, 615-631.

Cerioli, A., & Zani, S. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In C. Dagum & M. Zenga (Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272-284). Springer.

Chi, G., Fang, H., Chatterjee, S., & Blumenstock, J. E. (2022). Microestimates of wealth for all low- and middle-income countries. PNAS, 119(3), e2113658119.

Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs. (2024). National social safety net assessment report 2024. Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.

Hossain, M. A., Ahmed, S., & Rahman, T. (2025). Temporal resilience in machine learning poverty models. Journal of Development Economics, 174, Article 103124.

Jean, N., Burke, M., Xie, M., Davis, W. M., Lobell, D. B., & Ermon, S. (2016). Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science, 353(6301), 790-794.

Khoun, S., Leng, P., & Kim, S. (2025). Precision poverty mapping using machine learning and geospatial big data. World Development, 187, Article 106234.

Lemmi, A., & Betti, G. (Eds.). (2006). Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. Springer.

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765-4774.

Marin Diaz, A., Garcia-Galan, S., & Carrasco, R. A. (2025). FAS-XAI: A fuzzy-adaptive system for explainable AI in high-stakes decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 33(2), 456-471.

Merttens, F., Barca, V., & Kardan, A. (2024). Targeting performance and exclusion errors in Northern Nigerian social protection. Development Policy Review, 42(3), e12710.

National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Nigeria multidimensional poverty index 2024. Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Nigeria Data Protection Act. (2023). Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (Section 26). Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette.

Noriega-Campero, A., Bakker, M. A., Garcia-Bulle, B., & Pentland, A. (2020). Active fairness in algorithmic decision making. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 108-114.

Numboro, M. S., Tang, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). Stacking ensemble methods for enhanced prediction in high-variance contexts. Information Sciences, 645, Article 119321.

Osei-Dwomoh, K., & Forkuo, E. K. (2026). Fragility bias in AI-driven social protection. World Development, 195, Article 106732.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45-77.

Prieto, J. (2024). Degrees of vulnerability to poverty: A dynamic classification framework. Review of Income and Wealth, 70(3), 678-702.

Rabbi, M. F. (2025). XGBoost with SHAP for regulatory-compliant poverty prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 248, Article 123890.

Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215.

Shieh, M., & Shah, K. U. (2025). Developing a fuzzy MCDA-based multidimensional index for energy poverty. Energy Policy, 186, Article 113945.

Tamambang, F. N., Adekunle, O., Okeke, C. J., & Nwosu, E. (2024). Two are better than one but three is best. BMC Public Health, 24(1), Article 2456.

Tang, Y., Chen, X., & Wu, D. (2024). Meta-learning approaches in ensemble methods: A systematic review. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(2), Article 45.

UNICEF. (2024). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey Nigeria 2024: Preliminary findings. United Nations Children's Fund.

Wang, Z., Chen, Y., & Gui, B. (2025). Multidimensional poverty and financial participation. China Economic Review, 83, Article 102045.

World Bank. (2024). Nigeria poverty assessment 2024 and GHS Wave 5 data quality audit. World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-12

How to Cite

Anagu, E. J., Umar Mairo, U. M., & Sabo, V. (2026). An Explainable Ai Framework For Transparent Poverty Classification And Citizen Engagement In Nigeria. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 6(2), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v6i2.8205

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.