Peran Struktur Organisasi dalam Distribusi Beban Kerja Guru dan Tenaga Pendidikan di SMP N 1 Kalibening
The Role of Organizational Structure in the Distribution of Workload of Teachers and Educational Personnel at SMP N 1 Kalibening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8301Keywords:
Beban Kerja, Guru, Manajemen Sekolah, Tenaga KependidikanAbstract
The school's organizational structure plays a strategic role in determining the distribution of workload among teachers and educational staff. However, in practice, there is often a gap between the formal structure and the reality of task distribution in the field. This study aims to analyze the influence of organizational structure on the distribution of the workload for teachers and educational staff at SMPN 1 Kalibening and to identify the alignment between the structural design and actual work practices. The study used a qualitative case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation studies, and were then analyzed thematically through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the organizational structure has been formally designed based on school needs, individual competencies, and periodic evaluations. However, in its implementation, there is still flexibility in roles and additional tasks beyond formal job descriptions. This condition reflects the semi-formal and adaptive nature of the organization, which aligns with the concept of a loosely coupled system in educational organizations. Workload distribution is influenced not only by the administrative structure but also by leadership dynamics, internal coordination, and the school's contextual needs. These findings confirm that an organization's structure is effective not only by its formal design but also by its alignment with actual work practices. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen data-based workload evaluation and formalize additional tasks to create a fairer, more proportional, and sustainable workload distribution.
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources Model: State of the Art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, no. 3.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Demerouti, E., Nachreiner, F., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands–Resources Model of Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, no. 3, 499–512.
Ganster, D. C., & Rosen, C. C. (2013). Work Stress and Employee Health: A Multidisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, Vol. 39 No.
Haeri, I. Z., & Afriansyah, A. (2014). Eksplorasi Beban Digital Guru: Survei Pemanfaatan Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM) oleh Guru. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 15, no 2.
Hancock, P. A., & Meshkati, N. (1988). Human Mental Workload. North-Holland.
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT, 39, no. 2.
Indonesia, K. P. dan K. R. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberdayaan Sekolah.
Indonesia, R. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Lahay, R., Syamsinah, & Sukrianto. (2024). Analisis beban kerja tenaga pendidik dan tenaga kependidikan di SMP Negeri 4 Satu Atap Paguyaman. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis (JIMB), 12(2), 70–77.
Lazuardy, D. A., Untami, D. T., Fatma, A. N., Trihantoyo, S., & Nuphanudin. (2024). Analisis penempatan dan penugasan tenaga kependidikan di SMP Negeri 18 Surabaya. Tsaqofah: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia, 4(3), 1581–1591. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i3.2916
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2022). Burnout and Engagement: Contributions to a New Vision. Burnout Research, 5.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2023). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall.
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2024). The Demands of Teaching and Learning: TALIS 2024 Insights. OECD Publishing.
Pradana, M. A. W., & Susilowati, T. (2024). Analisis Beban Kerja Tenaga Pendidik di SMK Kristen 1 Surakarta. PPIMAN: Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen, 2, No. 3.
Puspitasari, D. R., Suharto, N., & Permata Sari, H. (2023). Influence of quality of work life, organizational culture and workload on teacher performance. International Journal of Humanities and Educational Social Science, 3(1), 2091–2104.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. K. (2012). Management. Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations. Free Press.
Syafriani, V. (2024). Bridging theories and practice: Organizational management in an Indonesian school context. Global Review of Tourism and Social Sciences.
Syarief, F., & Hidayatulloh, H. (2023). Hubungan beban kerja, perencanaan SDM, dan kinerja guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 112–123.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, no. 1.
Wilson, J. R., & Corlett, N. (2015). Evaluation of Human Work. CRC Press.
Yin, R. K. (2024). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amru Setyawinta, Ainas Sa’adah, Abdul Wahid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
