Grammatical Error Analysis in the English Writing of Indonesian EFL Learners

Authors

  • M Hanif Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura
  • Eka Susylowati Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura
  • Wiwik Yulianti Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8175

Keywords:

Error Analysis, EFL Learners, Grammatical Errors, Indonesian Students, Second Language Writing

Abstract

Writing in English is an essential skill in today’s globalized world. As one of the most widely used international languages, English plays a crucial role in education, business, technology, and communication. The ability to write effectively in English allows individuals to express ideas clearly, share information, and interact with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. The mastery of English grammar remains a significant challenge for EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners, particularly in environments where English is not used in everyday communication. This study examines grammatical errors found in written English compositions produced by Indonesian high school students. Using the Error Analysis framework developed by Corder (1967) and expanded by Dulay, Burt, and Krashen (1982), this study aims to identify, categorize, and analyze the most common grammatical errors and their possible sources. The data were obtained from thirty narrative essays written by students in their second year of senior high school in Surabaya. The analysis revealed that errors in verb tense, article usage, subject-verb agreement, preposition use, and word order were most frequently encountered. These findings suggest that both interlingual and intralingual factors contribute significantly to the errors produced by EFL learners. The study concludes with pedagogical implications for improving grammar instruction in EFL contexts, especially in Indonesian classrooms.

References

Azahra, F., Thamrin, N. S., Anggreni, A., & Rofiqoh, R. (2025). Error Analysis in Using Passive Voice among University Students: Comparative Taxonomy. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 8(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v8i1.160-176

Broughton, G. et all (2003). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd Fq.

Brown, H. D. (2000). “Principles of Language Learning and Teaching” (4th ed.). Michigan: Longman.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. “International Review of Applied Linguistics”, 5(4), 161–170.

Danesi, M. (1993). Whither contrastive analysis? Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 37–46

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. In The Modern Language Journal(Vol. 67, Issue 3, p. 273). https://doi.org/10.2307/327086

Ellis, R. (1997). “Second Language Acquisition”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fauziati, E. (2014). Contrastive analysis, transfer analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage: Four concepts one goal. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES), 1(2), 9–21

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Pearson.

Huong Vo, Lien, Long Viet Le , Mai-Duyen Pham (2025). Engagement in Thesis Writing: An Appraisal Analysis of EFL Student Writers’ Evaluation of Prior Academic Works. Arab World English Journal, 16 (4), 148-164. 10.24093/awej/vol16no4.8

James, C. (1998). “Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis”. Longman.

Khoirunnisa, U., & Misnadin, M. (2022). An Analysis of Pronunciation errors Produced by Indonesian Learners of English: A Case Study of English Department Students of Trunojoyo University. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, 7(2), 130–145

Kurteš, S. (2006). Contrastive analysis at work: theoretical considerations and their practical application. SIGNUM: Estud. Ling, (9/1), 111-140

Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Esp Students’ Use of Appraisal Language in Tourism Blogs. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 9(2), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v9i2.24574

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mohammed, M. I. (2022). An Empirical Study of Pragmatic Failure by Kurdish EFL Learners in the Performance of Conversational Implicature.The Scientific Journal of Cihan University–Sulaimaniya,6(2), 47-59

Richards, J. C. (1971). A non-contrastive approach to error analysis. “English Language Teaching Journal”, 25(3), 204–219.

Sidabutar, U., & Padede, A. (2020). Contrastive analysis. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas HKBP Nommensen.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

Hanif, M., Susylowati, E., & Yulianti, W. (2026). Grammatical Error Analysis in the English Writing of Indonesian EFL Learners. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(01), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v6i01.8175

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.