Pengaruh Network Behavior Terhadap Venture Performance Dengan Social Capital dan Tacit Knowledge Sebagai Variabel Mediasi

Authors

  • Dandi Dandi Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Ani Muwarni Muhar Universitas Harapan Medan
  • Ezzah Nahrisah Universitas Harapan Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/jebidi.v1i2.53

Keywords:

Network Behavior, Social Capital, Tacit Knowledge, Venture Performance, UMKM

Abstract

This Study aims to determine the effect of Network Behavior on Venture Performance with Tacit Knowledge as variable mediating on small business in Percut Sei Tuan district. The methods analysis using regression analysis and kausal step methods used to know the effect between variable independent and variable dependent with mediating by variable mediating. The type of data used in this research is assosiative with paradigm quantitative. The population and sample in this study is the all of small business in Percut Sei Tuan district amount 295 business with 170 business as sample.The Results showed that variable Network Behavior has a positive and significant effect on variable Venture Performance. Variable Social Capital has a significant effect on variableVenture Performance, also variable Tacit knowledge has a significant effect on variable Venture Performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andy Hendrawan & Andi Wijaya (2020) Pengaruh Dimensi Orientasi Kewirausahaan dan Jaringan Usaha Terhadap Kinerja Usaha UMKM di Jakarta Barat, Jurnal Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan, Vol. 3/2020 577-586

Anton Susanto (2015) Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Penggunaan Internet Masyarakat Desa Pasar VI Kualanamu, Deli Serdang Sumatera Utara, Jurnal Penelitian Pos dan Informatika Vol. 5 No.1 (2015), e-ISSN: 2476-9266 p-ISSN: 2088-9402

Arisena, G (2016), ‘Konsep kewirausahaan pada petani melalui pendekatan Structural Equation Model (SEM)’, E-Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata, vol. 5, no. 1.

Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

BAUMOL, W. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and innovation: The (Micro) theory of price and profit. File: Entpricetheory-w-apr-4-2007.

BARTOL, K. M. & SRIVASTAVA, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of

Bell, R., and Kilpatrick, S., (2000), Small Business and Networks, Aspects of Social Capital in Small Rural Town, Centre for Research, and Learning in Regional Australia University of Tasmania, Launceston Tas 7250

Burt. (2010). Evaluasi Kinerja. Bandung : Revika Aditama.

CASCIARO, T., GINO, F. & KOUCHAKI, M. (2016). Learn to love networking. Harvard Business Review, 94, 104-107.

Christiana Weber & Barbara Weber (2014), Social Capital and Knowledge Relatedness as Promoters of Organizational Performance, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol. 40 No. 3 ISSN 0020–8825/2010

Christyanto Sulisthio & Albert Yulianus (215) Analisis Pengaruh Tacit Knowledge dan Explicit Knowledge Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di Restoran “X” Surabaya, Vol. 3 No. 1

Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and paractice. Boston:

Elsevier.

Dedy Rahman & Yanki Hartijasti (2017) PERAN SOCIAL CAPITAL DALAM MEMEDIASI PENGARUH SOCIAL MEDIA TERHADAP KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER DAN WORK PERFORMANCE (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Umum BULOG), Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen Tirtayasa, Vol. 1 No. 2 November 2017

Desy Kartika Suri (2016), Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Tacit Knowledge Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan

Devi Analia, Yusman Syaukat, Akhmad Fauzi, Ernan Rustiadi (2019), Modal Sosial (Network) Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Usaha Mikro Kecil (UMK) di Kota Padang Sumatera Barat, Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, Vol. 3 No. 1 108-117, ISSN: 2614-4670 (p), ISSN: 2598-8174 (e)

Donna Marie De Carolis, Barrie E. Litzky, Kimberly A. Eddleston (2009), Why Network Enhance the Progress of New Venture Creation: The Influence of Social Capital and Cognition, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33 No. 2

Eduardo Bueno, J. Alberto Aragon, M. Paz Salmador, Victor J. Garcia (2010), Tangible Slack versus intangible resources: The Influence of Technology Slack and Tacit Knowledge on the Capability of Organisational Learning to Generate innovation and Perormance, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol. 49, No. 4,

Eny Endah Pujiastuti & R. Heru Kristanto HC, HUMAN CAPITAL, SOCIAL CAPITAL DAN PENGARUNYA TERHADAP KINERJA PERUSAHAAN (STUDY PADA BANK SLEMAN), ISBN 978-602-17067-0-1

Erwan Agus Purwanto, dan Dyah Ratih Sulistyastuti (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Untuk Administrasi Publik, Dan Masalah-masalah Sosial. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Untuk Administrasi Publik, Dan Masalah-masalah Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gaya Media.

Feby Fitriani Sudarsono PENGARUH SOCIAL CAPITAL TERHADAP PEMANFAATAN SOSIAL MEDIA UNTUK KNOWLEDGE SHARING PADA GENERASI Z, (2020)

G.K Gandhiadi, Komang Dharmawan, I Putu Eka Nila Kencana, Peran Pemerintah, Modal Sosial, dan Kinerja Usaha Terhadap Kesejahteraan Subjektif Pelaku Industri Tenun di Kabupaten Jembrana, Bali, Jurnal Matematika Vol. 8, No. 1, Juni (2018) ISSN: 1693-1394

Ghozali, I. (2011), Structural equation modeling metode alternatif. Dengan partial least square PLS. Semarang: Undip

Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Progam SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

HAFEEZ, K. & ABDELMEGUID, H. (2003). Dynamics of Human Resource and Knowledge Management. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 153-164.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. (2002). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Harold Harlow (2008), The Effect of Tacit Knowledge on Firm Performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 12 No. 1 pp. 148-163 ISSN 1367-3270

Halpern, D. F. (2010). Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment. Publisher: SCHUHFRIED (Vienna Test System). http://www.schuhfried.com/vienna-test-system-vts/all-tests-from-a- z/test/hcta-halpern-critical-thinking-assessment-1/

Heni Kuswanti, Margunani (2020), Pengaruh Jaringan Sosial dan Pendidikan Kewirausahaan terhadap Niat Berwirausaha dengan Persepsi Kontrol Perilaku sebagai Variabel Moderasi, Economic Education Analysis Journal, Vol. 9 No.1 p-ISSN 2252-6544, e-ISSN 2502-356X

Henslin, James. (2006). Sosiologi dengan Pendekatan Membumi. Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga.

HOANG, H. & ANTONCIC, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165-187.

Isaac Gumah Akolgo, Cai Li, Peter Yao Lartey, Kankam William Adomako (2020), Entrepreneur Network Behavior as the Gamechanger for the Venture Performance: The Mediation effect of Social Capital and Tacit Knowledge, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology IJSRST, Vol. 7 No.2, P ISSN: 2395-6011 ISSN: 2395-602X

JAVALGI, R. G., HALL, K. D. & CAVUSGIL, S. T. (2014). Corporate entrepreneurship, customer-oriented selling, absorptive capacity, and international sales performance in the international B2B setting: Conceptual framework and research propositions. International Business Review, 23, 1193-1202.

KOGAN, L., PAPANIKOLAOU, D., SERU, A. & STOFFMAN, N. J. T. Q. J. O. E. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. 132, 665-712.

Leonardus Ricky Rengkung, Lyndon R.J Pangemanan & Lorraine W.Th.Sondak, PENGARUH TACIT KNOWLEDGE TERHADAP INOVASI PRODUK PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF KERAJINAN DI KABUPATEN MINAHASA, SULAWESI UTARA, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Volume 9, No. 1, Februari (2019)

Maurer, I. & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 262-292.

Metha, C.R. & Patel, N.R. (2012) IBM SPSS Exact Tests. 1-236.

MEMON, N. 2016. Entrepreneurship in the eyes of network science. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 935-943. [30].

NONAKA, I., KODAMA, M., HIROSE, A. & KOHLBACHER, F. J. E. M. J. (2014). Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation–A new paradigm for organizational theory. 32, 137-146.

Neli Febrida & Purwantoro (2020), Pengaruh Employee Engagement dan Modal Sosial terhadap Organiztional Citizenship Behavior (OCB) Karyawan Pada Dinas Tanaman Pangan dan Holtikultural Kabupaten Rokan Hulu, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis, Vol.2 No.2 pp: 165 - 174

Nikita Kurnia (2011), Model Hubungan Tacit Knowledge dan Kinerja Individu Pada Balai Riset dan Standarisasi Industri

Poppy Alvianolita Sanistasya, Kusdi Rahardjo & Mohammad Iqbal, Pengaruh Literasi Keuangan dan Inklusi Keuangan Terhadap Kinerja Usaha Kecil di Kalimantan Timur, Jurnal Economia, Volume 14, Nomor 1, April (2019) P-ISSN: 1858-2648 E-ISSN: 2460-1152

Pudjo Sugito & Kamaluddin, INOVASI DAN KEUNGGULAN BERSAING: STUDI KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, TALENT DEVELOPMENT DAN MODAL SOSIAL, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, Vol. 18, No. 1 Maret (2014) ISSN 1411 – 03

Puspitasari, Rita Nurmalia, Anna Fariyanti, & Adhitya Marendra Kiloes (2018), Pengaruh factor Internal dan Eksternal Terhadap Perilaku Kewirausahaan dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Usaha Petani Anggrek, J. Hort. Vol. 28 No. 2, Desember 2018 : 299-310

Prell C. (2012). Social Network Analysis: History, Theory & Metodology. Singapore: SAGE.

Rivai, B.M. (2005). Performance appraisal. Jakarta:PT Raja Grafindo Persada

Rohmana, Y. (2013). Ekonometrika: Teori dan Aplikasi dengan Eviews. Bandung:

Laboratorium Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Koperasi FPEB UPI.

Sangkala, (2007), Knowledge Management. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Septian Geges, Waskitho Wibisono (2015), Pengembangan Pencegahan Serangan Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Pada Sumber Daya Jaringan Dengan Integritas Network Behavior Analysis dan Client Puzzle, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi - Volume 13, Nomer 1, Januari 2015: 53 – 67

Setyowati Subroto, Ira Maya Hapsari & Yanti Puji Astutie, ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KINERJA USAHA MIKRO KECIL DAN MENENGAH (UMKM) KABUPATEN BREBES, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2016) ISSN2089-3590,EISSN 2303-2472

Sevilla, Consuelo G. et. al (2007). Research Methods. Rex Printing Company. Quezon City.

Shu-Chen Yang & Cheng-Kiang Farn, Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A multi-informant design, International Journal of Information Management, 29 (2009) 210–218

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1982). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta : PT RAJA GRAFINDO PERSADA.

Sri Raharso, SOCIAL CAPITAL SEBAGAI MEDIATOR ANTARA TRUST DAN KNOWLEDGE SHARING: STUDI EMPIRIS DI MINIMARKET, Jurnal Manajemen, Vol.15, No.2, Mei (2016)

Sugiyono (2015), Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Http://bajakanbuku.blogspot.co.id

Sugiyono. (2012). Statistik Untuk Penelitian. Bandung :Cv. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta: Bandung

SU, J., ZHAI, Q. & KARLSSON, T. 2017. Beyond red tape and fools: Institutional theory in entrepreneurship research, 1992–2014. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 505-531.

Umar, Husein. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Aplikasi dalam pemasaran. Edisi II, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Wong, P. K., HO, Y. P. & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small business economics, 24, 335-350.

Yovita Annisa Aprilia, Margareta Suryaningsih & Titik Djumiarti (2015), Modal Sosial Masyarakat Dalam Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Rumah Layak Huni

Yuli Rohmiyati (2019), Faktor-faktor Pembentuk Tacit Knowledge pada Individu, ANUVA Volume 3 (2): 185-189, 2019, ISSN: 2598-3040

Ziana Asyifa, Muhammad Rakib, & H. Thamrin Tahir (2019), Pengaruh Kompetensi Kewirausahaan Terhadap Kinerja Usaha (Studi Pada Usaha Mikro Di Kecamatan Ma’rang Kabupaten Pangkep

Downloads

Published

2022-07-09

How to Cite

Dandi , D., Muhar, A. M., & Nahrisah , E. (2022). Pengaruh Network Behavior Terhadap Venture Performance Dengan Social Capital dan Tacit Knowledge Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Digital, 1(2), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.47709/jebidi.v1i2.53

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.